You are here: Home > Main > Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction and Gas Exchange During Exercise: RESULTS

Hypoxic Pulmonary Vasoconstriction and Gas Exchange During Exercise: RESULTS

Airflow obstruction was severe in all but patient 8, and all but one subject (patient 2) showed marked air trapping (Table 1). Hyperinflation was noticed only in patient 5. The Deo was reduced in four subjects (patients 2, 3, 5, and 6) (Table 1). Table 2 provides the metabolic, hemodynamic, and gas exchange data at rest and during exercise, before and after nifedipine. Nifedipine was well tolerated by all the patients and did not produce any symptomatic adverse side effect.

Rest Before Nifedipine

Oxygen uptake, heart rate, and Qt were normal. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (Ppa) was slightly increased (19 ±1 mm Hg; range, 14 to 25 mm Hg) but right ventricular stroke work index (RVSWI, 8.2 ±0.5 g-m/m2) was within normal limits. Capillary wedge pressure was normal (4 ± 1 mm Hg). Gas exchange was mildly impaired with some degree of arterial hypoxemia (range, 67 to 83 mm Hg) and mild increases in both the P(A-a)o2 (Table 2) and the percentage of venous admixture (Qs/Qt, 10 ± 1 per­cent). None of the patients had C02 retention, but all had Vd/Vt values higher than 40 percent. The inert gas data showed only small amounts of shunt and/or blood flow to lung units with Va/Q ratios lower than 0.1 (less than 1 percent of Qt, each) (Table 2). Seven of the eight patients showed a broad unimodal blood flow distribution without shunt (Fig 1); patient 7 showed a bimodal blood flow distribution. Only patient 5 had a noticeable amount of shunt (2.6 percent of Qt). Four patients (patients 1, 3, 5, and 7) had bimodal ventilation distributions with a substantial percentage of Ve distributed to high Va/Q areas (10 to 100) (Table 2 and Fig 1). The dispersion of the blood flow and ventilation distributions (Logsn Q and LogsD V, re­spectively) (normal range, 0.3 to 0.6) and the overall amount of Va/Q mismatching estimated from raw retention and excretion values (DISP R-E*) were moderate to severely increased with respect to nor­mal. generic cialis 20mg

Table 1—General Data and Lung Function Results

Patient No.

Age, У

Height, cm

Weight, kg

FEV,

FEV, Ratio, percent FVC

TLC

RV

RWTLC, percent

Deo

L

percent pred

L

percent pred

L

percent pred

ml/min/mm Hg

percent pred

1

67

161

72

0.96

35

34

7.13

106

4.14

139

58

24.46

105

2

64

175

94

1.54

43

39

7.11

88

3.12

94

44

17.42

61

3

57

171

82

1.19

34

35

7.78

103

4.35

147

56

19.46

69

4

58

172

87

1.33

38

48

8.87

117

5.99

201

68

23.05

81

5

65

164

73

0.53

18

24

9.38

135

7.17

239

76

14.30

58

6

61

170

80

1.17

35

39

7.37

98

4.19

137

57

18.46

67

7

64

158

55

0.89

33

34

6.39

100

3.77

134

59

19.94

87

8

59

162

70

1.57

52

56

7.45

112

4.51

165

61

24.55

97

x±SEM

62±1

167±2

77±4

1.15±0.I2 36 ±3

39±3

7.69 ±0.35

108±5

4.66 ±0.46

157 ±16

60±3

20.21 ±1.28

78±6

Rest After Nifedipine (vs Rest Before Nifedipine)

Neither Ppa nor Pw (4 ± 1 to 3 ± 1 mm Hg) changed but Qt increased (Table 2). Consequently, TPVR fell.

Besides, for a given flow Ppa was always lower after nifedipine (Fig 2). The RVSWI did not change (8.2 ± 0.5 to 9.1 ± 1.2 g*m/m2). As previously reported, Ve increased slightly (9.4 to 10.4 L.min) but signif­icantly (p<0.05) after nifedipine. As a result, PaC02 fell and arterial pH rose. The Vd/Vt did not change (Table 2). Oxygen exchange worsened: Pa02 showed a trend to be lower (76 to 71 mm Hg, p = 0.06), P(A-a)o2 was larger (28 to 36 mm Hg, p<0.05), and Qs/Qt was higher (10 ± 1 to 15 ±2 percent, p<0.05). Because of the above-mentioned increase in Qt 02 delivery improved (992 ±85 to 1,228 ±97 ml-min p<0.005). Ventilation-perfusion mismatching in­creased after nifedipine (higher DISP R-E*, p<0.001) (Table 2). Specifically, the blood flow distribution shifted toward a lower Va/Q ratio (Q decreased, p<0.01) and became wider (LogSI) Q increased, p<0.005) (Table 2). A separate low Va/Q mode of blood flow appeared in five subjects (patients 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8) (Fig 1). These changes are in keeping with previous results and strongly suggest release of HPV. Despite the increase observed in the dispersion of the ventilation, distribution (LogSI) V) was not modified by nifedipine. However, this increase in Ve probably explains the significantly higher V observed at rest after giving the drug (Table 2).
buy cialis soft tabs

Table 2—Metabolic, Hemodynamic, and Gas Exchange Data


Before Nifedipine


After Nifedipine


Rest

p
Value


Exercise


Rest

p
Value


Exercise

Vo2,
ml/min

259 ±20

0.001

872 ±94

269 ±15

0.001

843 ±57

R

0.81 ±0.02

0.80 ±0.03

0.82 ±0.02

0.80 ±0.03

Hr,
min-1

75 ±4

0.001


106±6


83±6b

0.001

116
±5B


Q
t,
L
/min

5.4 ±0.3

0.001

10.6 ±0.8

6.8
±
0.5е

0.001


12.2±0.9C

Ci,
L/min/m*


2.9±0.1

0.001

5.8 ±0.3

3.7
±
0.2е

0.001

6.6
±
0.3е

Ppa,
mm Hg

19
±
1

0.001


44±3

19 ±2

0.001


36±1B


TPVR, mm Hg/IVmin


3.6±0.3

0.01

4.2 ±0.3


2.8±0.2d

0.01

3.1 ±0.2°

Ps,
mm Hg

106 ±4

0.001

135 ±10


88±5C

0.001

116
±6C

Ve,
L/min


9.4±0.7

0.001


24.2±2.8

10.4 ±0.7-

0.001

25.9
±
2.4A

f,
min-1

19 ±2

0.001


29±2


20±2

0.001


29±2

Pa02
mm Hg

76 ±2

68 ±4

71 ±3

66 ±4


PaCO„ mm Hg

39 ±2

0.001


43±2

37 ±2″

0.001


42±2A

pH

7.40 ±0.02

0.001

7.35 ±0.02

7.41 ±0.02-

0.001


7.36±0.02A

BE,
mmol/L


0.3±0.7

0.001

-2.8 ±0.8

1±0.6

0.001


2.5±0.6

Pv02,
mm Hg

38 ±2

0.001


30±1

39
±
1

0.001

31 ±1

Р(А-а)Ож

28 ±2


31±3

36
±
1′


34±3A



V
d/Vt,


%

50 ±2

0.001


42±2

47 ±3

47 ±3*


Shunt,
%

0.6 ±0.3

0.5 ±0.3


0.7±0.4


0.5±0.3


Low

V
a/Q,
%

0.8 ±0.4


0.8±0.4


2.5±
1.5


2.7±
1.5


High

V
a/Q,
%


5.8±3.0


3.7±2.2

6.1 ±3.5


6.2±2.5


Dead Space,
%

29.2 ±2.9

29.1 ±3.5

28.2 ±3.2

28.5 ±2.9

Q

0.79 ±0.06

0.005


1.18±0.12


0.64±0.04b

0.005

1.07 ±0.10®


LogsoQ

0.90 ±0.06

0.05

0.78 ±0.07

1.08
±
0.08е

0.05


1.00±0.10c

V

2.14 ±0.27

2.23 ±0.27

2.22 ±0.28′


2.60±0.29A


LogsoV


1.03±0.11

0.001

0.83 ±0.09

1.06 ±0.09

0.001

0.92 ±0.09


DISP R-E*


12.1±
1.0

0.001


7.9±0.9

15.2
± 1.3d

0.001


10.9±
1.1°

Related Posts:

Tags: ,

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • Twitter

Leave a Reply

Related Posts: